EMAIL DISCLAIMER AGREEMENT

We are pleased that you desire to contact a person at McCandlish Lillard via e-mail. This website contains information about McCandlish Lillard but not legal advice, and you should not consider it to contain legal advice.  Before you proceed with an e-mail to us, we must caution you that WE CANNOT ACCEPT ANY INFORMATION FROM YOU UNTIL WE KNOW THAT DOING SO WILL NOT BE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH AN EXISTING CLIENT. 

An attorney-client relationship will arise only when there is an express agreement between you and McCandlish Lillard.  PLEASE DO NOT SEND US ANY INFORMATION THAT IS SPECIFIC TO YOUR LEGAL CONCERN OR THAT MIGHT BE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL without first obtaining written confirmation to do so from one of McCandlish Lillard’s attorneys. Information received by McCandlish Lillard prior to McCandlish Lillard providing confirmation for you to send it will not be treated as private, confidential or otherwise be protected from disclosure, and instead MAY BE USED BY McCANDLISH LILLARD AND ITS ATTORNEYS AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER, EVEN IF ADVERSE (CONTRARY) TO YOUR INTERESTS. You are welcome, however, without seeking or receiving the above written confirmation, to e-mail non-confidential and non-specific general inquiries, such as asking whether McCandlish Lillard handles particular types of transactions, or simply asking someone to please contact you.

Please click AGREE if you understand and accept the foregoing conditions and wish to proceed with an e-mail. If you have not understood and accepted the foregoing conditions, you should click DISAGREE, but you remain welcome to browse our web site or to telephone us for more information.

What's New

Client Wins Multimillion Dollar Jury Verdict in Will Contest Action

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Date:  August 3, 2016
Re:     Client Wins Multimillion Dollar Jury Verdict in Will Contest Action

R. Peyton Mahaffey, Lawrence J. McClafferty, and Bethany B. Ingersoll of McCandlish Lillard teamed with David Hudgins and Debra Stafford of Alexandria to win a recent will contest action in the Arlington County Circuit Court. The trial spanned 13 days over a four-week period. The jury rejected the clandestine efforts of the client’s father’s long time bookkeeper to probate a will she prepared and which was purportedly executed only months before his death. Instead the jury entered a verdict of over $7,600,000 for fraud, conversion and breach of fiduciary duty, and tacked on $175,000 in punitive damages. The client and his father had an estate plan that provided for the client to receive the family money upon the father’s death.

The evidence showed that during the father’s declining years, defendant began to take advantage of the father and isolate him from friends and family.  In addition to finding the later will to have been procured by undue influence, the jury further found that the defendant carried out a scheme to convert and divert family money from a myriad of bank accounts belonging in various forms to father and son.

Two Final Orders, one granting the client’s Motion to Probate the true last will and testament of his father and the other denying Defendant’s Motion to Probate the later will and entering Judgment in the amount just over $7,6000,000 plus $175,000 in punitive damages, were entered by Arlington County Circuit Court Judge Daniel S. Fiore, II on July 22, 2016.

(2016) Chris T. Sarris v. Mireille Curro, et al., Arlington County Circuit Court, Case No. CL 14-1945-00. 

***

McCandlish Lillard has 22 attorneys, with offices in Fairfax and Leesburg. The law firm has been meeting the legal needs of businesses and individuals in Northern Virginia and throughout the Commonwealth for more than 100 years. For more information regarding McCandlish Lillard or the above matter, please call Peyton Mahaffey at 703-934-1168, or the firm at 703-273-2288, or visit its website at www.mccandlishlawyers.com.

Any prior case results discussed or cited on this website do not guarantee or predict the same or a similar outcome in your case or any other future cases. Each case or legal issue is different, and the outcome of each case depends on a variety of factors that are unique to that case or matter.