EMAIL DISCLAIMER AGREEMENT

We are pleased that you desire to contact a person at McCandlish Lillard via e-mail. This website contains information about McCandlish Lillard but not legal advice, and you should not consider it to contain legal advice.  Before you proceed with an e-mail to us, we must caution you that WE CANNOT ACCEPT ANY INFORMATION FROM YOU UNTIL WE KNOW THAT DOING SO WILL NOT BE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH AN EXISTING CLIENT. 

An attorney-client relationship will arise only when there is an express agreement between you and McCandlish Lillard.  PLEASE DO NOT SEND US ANY INFORMATION THAT IS SPECIFIC TO YOUR LEGAL CONCERN OR THAT MIGHT BE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL without first obtaining written confirmation to do so from one of McCandlish Lillard’s attorneys. Information received by McCandlish Lillard prior to McCandlish Lillard providing confirmation for you to send it will not be treated as private, confidential or otherwise be protected from disclosure, and instead MAY BE USED BY McCANDLISH LILLARD AND ITS ATTORNEYS AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER, EVEN IF ADVERSE (CONTRARY) TO YOUR INTERESTS. You are welcome, however, without seeking or receiving the above written confirmation, to e-mail non-confidential and non-specific general inquiries, such as asking whether McCandlish Lillard handles particular types of transactions, or simply asking someone to please contact you.

Please click AGREE if you understand and accept the foregoing conditions and wish to proceed with an e-mail. If you have not understood and accepted the foregoing conditions, you should click DISAGREE, but you remain welcome to browse our web site or to telephone us for more information.

Resources

Spousal Support Guideline Changes

This memorandum, by McCandlish Lillard attorney Douglas J. Sanderson, addresses the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 on spousal support guidelines in Virginia, which has yet to officially address changes brought by the Act. It then presents recommendations for going forward in Virginia.  If a payor were to agree to pay the same amount of spousal support as he/she would have paid under the prior tax laws affecting spousal support, the payor would suffer a significant increase in the real cost of the payments, while the payee would enjoy a potential windfall due to that amount not being taxable as income. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a brief overview of the changes caused by the Act along with an overview of how several states have responded by amending their spousal support maintenance guidelines to adjust fairly for the new tax law.

Click here for the full memorandum.